27
Court as the Straits Settlements do, and the Chief Justice
has full authority to take any books from it which he may
require. The matter is still the subject of discussion.
4.
I have given this question my most
careful consideration, and have made extended enquiries
into the opinions held by both Officers in the Government
Service and others regarding it. I submit to Your Lordship
the conclusions I have arrived at, so far as I have been
able to reach a definite conclusion.
There is undoubtedly a consensus
of opinion, which I myself share, that the Appeal Court as
constituted is a farce, and that a proper Appeal Court is
very urgently needed. Appeals from the Chief Justice are
in effect appeals to himself since he has the predominant
voice in a Court consisting of two only. In the 4th. para-
-graph of my letter of 8th. February, 1908, to the Chief
Justice, I made a suggestion that if it were found practic-
-able the Judge of Shanghai might sit as an Appeal Judge
in the Supreme Court here. Sir F. Piggott replies to this
in paragraph 14 of his letter of 29th. February, 1908, and
assɩmmes:-
(a) that the Foreign Office would desire recipro-
-city, i.e. that a Judge from Hongkong should visit
Shanghai in order to sit as Appeal Judge there;
(b)
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.